Legal News

‍

When it comes to compensating employees in private companies, equity is a popular tool used to incentivize and retain top talent. However, there are two common ways equity can be granted: through an option to purchase equity or a grant of equity. Understanding the difference between these two compensation structures is important for both employers and employees.

An option to purchase equity is essentially a contract that gives an employee the right to purchase a certain number of shares of the company's stock at a predetermined price, known as the strike price. The option typically has a specific expiration date and can only be exercised after a certain amount of time has passed, known as the vesting period. The vesting period is typically several years and is meant to incentivize employees to stay with the company for a longer period of time.

On the other hand, a grant of equity is the outright issuance of shares to an employee. The employee receives the shares without having to pay any money upfront, and the shares are typically subject to a vesting period, similar to an option.

One key difference between these two compensation structures is the timing of the tax implications. Another difference is the level of risk and potential reward for the employee. With an option to purchase equity, the employee has the option to buy the stock at the strike price, but is not obligated to do so if the stock price does not rise above the strike price. If the stock price does rise above the strike price, the employee can purchase the stock at a discount and potentially make a significant profit. However, if the stock price does not rise above the strike price, the option can expire worthless, resulting in no financial gain for the employee. With a grant of equity, the employee receives the shares outright, and if the stock price rises, the employee can realize gains immediately. However, if the stock price does not rise or even decreases, the employee could potentially lose money.

Ultimately, whether an option to purchase equity or a grant of equity is a better form of compensation depends on the specific circumstances of the company and the employee. For example, if the company is young and has a lot of potential for growth, an option to purchase equity may be more attractive, as the employee has the potential for a large payout if the company is successful. However, if the company is more established and stable, a grant of equity may be more appealing, as the employee can realize gains immediately and without the risk of the option expiring worthless.

In conclusion, understanding the differences between an option to purchase equity and a grant of equity is crucial when it comes to structuring compensation for employees. Both options have their advantages and disadvantages, and it is important for employers and employees to carefully consider their options before making a decision.

‍

This is not legal advice and is attorney advertising.

‍