Legal News

Starbucks is facing multiple lawsuits from employees in Illinois, Colorado, and California who allege that the company’s newly implemented dress code violates state labor laws by requiring workers to purchase their own uniforms without reimbursement. The complaints argue that the new policy—introduced in May 2025—unlawfully shifts business costs onto employees, according to Law.com and AP News. (Law.com; AP News)

Under the revised policy, employees must wear solid black shirts, approved black, khaki, or blue denim pants, and waterproof shoes in neutral tones. Starbucks provides two branded shirts per employee but has refused to reimburse for additional clothing or required footwear. One plaintiff, Brooke Allen, alleges she spent more than $86 out of pocket, including $60 for compliant shoes, arguing that the company’s policy amounts to an unlawful uniform mandate. (AP News)

The lawsuits cite California Labor Code §2802, Colorado wage rules, and Illinois wage payment statutes, all of which require employers to reimburse employees for necessary work expenses. Plaintiffs claim Starbucks’ failure to cover these costs benefits the company’s branding while financially burdening employees. The cases are supported by Starbucks Workers United, which has also filed related unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). (The Daily Beast; Investopedia)

For employers, the case serves as a cautionary example: even seemingly minor dress code updates can trigger legal exposure if they impose unreimbursed costs on employees or lack compliance with state wage and hour laws. Companies should ensure written consent, transparent communication, and legal review before implementing new appearance standards.

‍

Outside Legal Counsel LLP advises employees and employers on wage compliance, reimbursement obligations, and workplace policy risk management. Contact us for a consultation.

‍

This is not legal advice and is attorney advertising.

‍

‍